<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of the web is small</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/</link>
	<description>Eric Karjaluoto discusses design, brands and experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:58:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SJL Website Design</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-75174</link>
		<dc:creator>SJL Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-75174</guid>
		<description>Great article, definitely in support of artist selling from their own sites, seemed to work fairly well for Radiohead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Great article, definitely in support of artist selling from their own sites, seemed to work fairly well for Radiohead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-73781</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-73781</guid>
		<description>Great post. I&#039;ve been following this path for about 18 months and I call it &quot;Micropreneurship&quot; (and &quot;Serial Micropreneurship&quot; once I started running multiple websites/apps).

This work/lifestyle choice lends itself to a super flexible schedule, location independence, and constant learning. It&#039;s not for everyone, but I am totally unemployable now - I could never go back to a salaried gig.

Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Great post. I've been following this path for about 18 months and I call it "Micropreneurship" (and "Serial Micropreneurship" once I started running multiple websites/apps).<br />
<br />
This work/lifestyle choice lends itself to a super flexible schedule, location independence, and constant learning. It's not for everyone, but I am totally unemployable now - I could never go back to a salaried gig.<br />
<br />
Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atul chatterjee</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-73523</link>
		<dc:creator>atul chatterjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 07:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-73523</guid>
		<description>Eric, I am planning to blog and the posts here have been a stimulator. I think it is possible to offer readers a blog at INR 500 per year or $10.
Yes, I would have to cater to a small audience and wouldn&#039;t  become like Rupert Murdoch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Eric, I am planning to blog and the posts here have been a stimulator. I think it is possible to offer readers a blog at INR 500 per year or $10.<br />
Yes, I would have to cater to a small audience and wouldn't  become like Rupert Murdoch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Intellection</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-73426</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Intellection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-73426</guid>
		<description>[...] on the future of the web. (Hint: It&#039;s small.)Again, it&#039;s not unimaginable wealth we desire, but the freedom to do as we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
[...] on the future of the web. (Hint: It's small.)Again, it's not unimaginable wealth we desire, but the freedom to do as we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The future of the web is small &#124; The Design Blog Database</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-73423</link>
		<dc:creator>The future of the web is small &#124; The Design Blog Database</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-73423</guid>
		<description>[...] I have a theory. It could prove incorrect or even shortsighted, nevertheless, it&#8217;s a bet I&#8217;m willing to make. I think businesses on the web are going to get a lot smaller. In the web world, we&#8217;re currently experiencing the fallout of the second of two tidal waves. The next one, however, will be slower, more distributed, and come with far less of a shock. (more&#8230;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
[...] I have a theory. It could prove incorrect or even shortsighted, nevertheless, it&#8217;s a bet I&#8217;m willing to make. I think businesses on the web are going to get a lot smaller. In the web world, we&#8217;re currently experiencing the fallout of the second of two tidal waves. The next one, however, will be slower, more distributed, and come with far less of a shock. (more&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Intellection</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-73328</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Intellection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-73328</guid>
		<description>[...] on the future of the web. (Hint: It&#039;s small.)Again, itâ€™s not unimaginable wealth we desire, but the freedom to do as we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
[...] on the future of the web. (Hint: It's small.)Again, itâ€™s not unimaginable wealth we desire, but the freedom to do as we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Visions</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-69534</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Visions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-69534</guid>
		<description>[...] Visions   Add   Eric on the future of the web. (Hint: It&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
[...] Visions   Add   Eric on the future of the web. (Hint: It&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Karjaluoto</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-68642</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Karjaluoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-68642</guid>
		<description>Nice suggestion--I&#039;ll keep an eye out for that book.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Nice suggestion--I'll keep an eye out for that book.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Karina Luna</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-68641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Karina Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-68641</guid>
		<description>Totally! I have thought and talked about the idea of staying small for a while now. Apparently and in general, people just think in terms of getting rich or being totally poor (as you mentioned, Eric) and don&#039;t see anything in between. I never understood the statement made by business consultants that if a company doesn&#039;t grow, it&#039;ll die. That&#039;s not true at all! I can say from my own experience as I finally got tired of these narrow statements and decided to do things my way, with success (in my view, which is the point here). Besides, being from Brasil, I can&#039;t tell you how many families I know that were well sustained by very small mom and pops businesses, as sewing, cooking, etc. They stayed simple, accessible, and community-oriented. Can you say they were not successful? When we start measuring success differently -- based on what&#039;s important in our lives --  and not only solely on financial reward (which it should only be a part of it) we will break free from useless ideas that, in most cases, don&#039;t fit our realities. Could success be: have a day populated with other things than only work (i.e.: work=25%) as taking care of family affairs, enjoy being at home, be quiet doing nothing, reading, go for a walk, not work some days, go home for lunch  and dinner (instead of frozen food), more sleep, make art, cook lunch, cook dinner, cook breakfast, spend a day with a friend, sleep in the morning, take a road trip in the middle of the week, work with a sense of service (according to people&#039;s needs) on things that are meaningful and pleasant to you. AND, be free to choose when to do any of these things. To me, the above cited things are luxurious rewards and I will exchange money for any of them almost always.

Career is a concept of the 20th Century. Working all the time is neither natural nor desirable. Obviously there are other always of doing things, but after decades of capitalism we can&#039;t seem to establish any connection without adding money to the glue that hold these connections. With risking sounding corny, I will add that while we remain completely absorbed in only capitalistic ideas, we won&#039;t be able to be creative in other ways that could possibly make our lives look more the way we keep dreaming they would.

If you&#039;re able to find, read Domenico Di Masi&#039;s (an Italian Sociologist) &quot;Creative Idleness&quot;. Not sure it has been published in English, which is no surprise given the types of ideas he presents (i.e.: part-time jobs for everybody + rest of the day engage in creative idleness).

Cheers!

&quot;Only immature people need a lot of money to make good use of their time.&quot; -Domenico Di Masi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Totally! I have thought and talked about the idea of staying small for a while now. Apparently and in general, people just think in terms of getting rich or being totally poor (as you mentioned, Eric) and don't see anything in between. I never understood the statement made by business consultants that if a company doesn't grow, it'll die. That's not true at all! I can say from my own experience as I finally got tired of these narrow statements and decided to do things my way, with success (in my view, which is the point here). Besides, being from Brasil, I can't tell you how many families I know that were well sustained by very small mom and pops businesses, as sewing, cooking, etc. They stayed simple, accessible, and community-oriented. Can you say they were not successful? When we start measuring success differently -- based on what's important in our lives --  and not only solely on financial reward (which it should only be a part of it) we will break free from useless ideas that, in most cases, don't fit our realities. Could success be: have a day populated with other things than only work (i.e.: work=25%) as taking care of family affairs, enjoy being at home, be quiet doing nothing, reading, go for a walk, not work some days, go home for lunch  and dinner (instead of frozen food), more sleep, make art, cook lunch, cook dinner, cook breakfast, spend a day with a friend, sleep in the morning, take a road trip in the middle of the week, work with a sense of service (according to people's needs) on things that are meaningful and pleasant to you. AND, be free to choose when to do any of these things. To me, the above cited things are luxurious rewards and I will exchange money for any of them almost always.<br />
<br />
Career is a concept of the 20th Century. Working all the time is neither natural nor desirable. Obviously there are other always of doing things, but after decades of capitalism we can't seem to establish any connection without adding money to the glue that hold these connections. With risking sounding corny, I will add that while we remain completely absorbed in only capitalistic ideas, we won't be able to be creative in other ways that could possibly make our lives look more the way we keep dreaming they would.<br />
<br />
If you're able to find, read Domenico Di Masi's (an Italian Sociologist) "Creative Idleness". Not sure it has been published in English, which is no surprise given the types of ideas he presents (i.e.: part-time jobs for everybody + rest of the day engage in creative idleness).<br />
<br />
Cheers!<br />
<br />
"Only immature people need a lot of money to make good use of their time." -Domenico Di Masi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The future of the web is small &#171; Know What&#8217;s Next</title>
		<link>http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/comment-page-1/#comment-63121</link>
		<dc:creator>The future of the web is small &#171; Know What&#8217;s Next</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideasonideas.com/2009/01/the-future-of-the-web-is-small/#comment-63121</guid>
		<description>[...] Full article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
[...] Full article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
